SubscribeStar Saturday: The Bare Minimum

Today’s post is a SubscribeStar Saturday exclusive.  To read the full post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.  For a full rundown of everything your subscription gets, click here.

The recent crackdown on crime, spearheaded by President Trump, in Washington, D.C.—as well as its incredible effectiveness—put to my mind the function of government at any level.  The most basic function—the bare minimum—that any government should perform is to protect the rights of its citizens from a.) foreign threats (invasion, violent illegal immigrants, etc.) and b.) domestic ones (crime).  Beyond that, governments should maintain and provide basic infrastructure that is conducive to commerce and mobility (roads, water, sewage) and should respond to the needs of their citizens as much as possible without infringing on the rights of the numeric minority.

That’s pretty much it.  Yet governments in the United States and Britain still fail to provide even those three simple functions—protection of people’s rights; provision of their basic infrastructural needs; and concern for their interests.

Case in point:  if the two nations’ leaders had really been paying attention to and cared about their constituents and their basic rights and needs, they never would have flooded their lands with illegal (and many legal) immigrants from foreign cultures.  Instead of conducting forever wars in distant lands, they would have paved the roads.  Instead of funneling money to Trojan Horse organizations designed to undermine our institutions with men in sundresses and mandatory DIE training, they would have invested in light rail or new water systems.

Instead, there’s been a sort of callous indifference to what normal—by which I mean average—people want.  It is abundantly clear that, had they been asked, most Americans and Britons would not have wanted endless streams of migration from the Third World.  They would not have accepted never-ending meddling in a part of the world that has been mired in conflict and authoritarianism since the Sumerian civilization first emerged around 4500 B.C.

It seems, however, that the tide is turning at last.

To read the rest of this post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.

The End of NPR

Well, they’ve finally done it—Republicans have defunded the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the congressionally-funded non-profit that operates the Public Broadcasting System and National Public Radio.  Note that this defunding is not a temporary executive order, one which a future Democratic President could undo with the stroke of a pen:  it’s part of Congress’s budget cutting, and the House holds the power of the purse.

Sure, it could all be undone, but it would require a Democratic President (or a RINO) and a Democratic majorities in both the House and the Senate.  Those both might return someday, but for now, conservatives and champions of limited and small(er) government can relish this accomplishment.

Read More »

TBT: VP Vance: A Worthy Successor

It’s hard to believe that a year ago, we were gearing up for a presidential election.  Now Trump is back in office—woooooot!—and he has a worthy successor in the wings.

It’s going to be tough sledding in the years ahead, but it’s reassuring to know that we have a legitimate successor ready to roll in 2028.  Vance’s incredible speech to the various heads of Europe’s governments earlier this year was a call to government accountability—and for Europe to wake up.  It was not an attack on Europe, per se, but a powerful plea for its leaders to do something to improve the lives of their people.

I’m excited to see more from Vance in the years to come.

With that, here is 17 July 2024’s “VP Vance: A Worthy Successor“:

Read More »

SubscribeStar Saturday: Why Epstein Matters

Today’s post is a SubscribeStar Saturday exclusive.  To read the full post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.  For a full rundown of everything your subscription gets, click here.

There’s been all sorts of swirling innuendo and hearsay circulating around the “will-they-won’t-they” of the Epstein files.  Pam Bondi has quite a bit of egg on her face and bleach in her hair after the debacle of “releasing” the files in February—which were just binders of all the information that was already out there.  Trump has indicated the whole thing is a distraction, even though one of his campaign promises was to release the full files.  We’ve been told again and again that they files are “on my desk.”

The Establishment Conservatives (Conservative, Inc.) are now saying there were never any files.  Trump is even calling it a Democrat hoax.

Come now.  Talk to anyone—conservative, progressive, socialist, anarcho-libertarian, monarchist, apatheticist, etc.—and they will all say the same thing:  “Epstein didn’t kill himself.”  The issue at stake—is there an elite cadre of perverts who have engaged in lurid acts with trafficked minors—transcends political allegiances.  We all know that these people exist; otherwise, why is Epstein dead and Ghislaine Maxwell in prison?

True, there is the possibility that it’s a “nothing burger,” and that might be the hardest Truth of all to swallow:  no one would believe it.  Heck, I wouldn’t—and don’t!—believe it.  The Epstein files are the “conspiracy theory” that everyone knows is true.  There’s a conspiracy, all right, but it’s a conspiracy fact.

We just need the documents to prove it.

To read the rest of this post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.

TBT: We Are All Deplorables Now

It’s wild to consider that, about a year ago, President Trump survived a public assassination attempt.  It was a turning point in the election, and had the president not turned to look at a chart at the precise moment the bullet flew, it likely would have been a dire turning point for the nation as a whole.

Fortunately, the bullet missed.  What is crazy to consider is that, a year on, this entire event seems to be forgotten—or, at least, not discussed very much.  I suppose that is the way of things—who talks about the various assassinations of European nobility and royalty in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries?  Other than an Austrian archduke, we don’t.

I still shudder to think of how differently things might have been had the bullet struck.  I suspect we’d have a J.D. Vance presidency—if the election had happened at all.  Civil war would have been a likely outcome; the government cracking down and/or cancelling the election on grounds of “public safety” could have been another.  Biden’s cancerous shell might still be marionetting around the White House.

Well, thank God the would-be assassin missed, but let us keep fighting on.

With that, here is 15 July 2025’s “We Are All Deplorables Now“:

Read More »

TBT^18,446,744,073,709,551,616: Happy Birthday, America!

It is wild looking back at the past year’s posts, and seeing how liberty keeps rallying to victory every time it seems near to death.  A year ago, the future seemed uncertain; today, it seems as though a light is shining through the fog.  Yes, America still has problems—lots of them—but we’re finally experiencing competent leadership that—gasp!—puts Americans first.

So it is that, at 249-years-old tomorrow, it seems that, at long last, America is back.

With that, here is 4 July 2024’s “TBT^4,294,967,296: Happy Birthday America!“:

Read More »

TBT^2: A Discourse on Disclaimers

What a difference a year makes.  It seems as though the election of Donaldus Magnus last November ushered in a profound cultural shift.  Being Left is cringe and gay.  It always was, but now normies are saying it out loud.

Sure, there’s still a lot of weirdos out there, but it’s fascinating to see how the culture has moved so wildly in such a short amount of time.  The age of needless disclaimers may very well be coming in—or, perhaps, it will intensify during the death throes of hand-wringing.

Well, we’ll see.  In the meantime, life is too short to bottle everything up.  Drop Truth Bombs, my friends!

With that, here is 27 June 2024’s “TBT: A Discourse on Disclaimers“:

Read More »

Tariffs: Worth It

There’s been a great deal of bellyaching this week about the tariffs that President Trump has slapped on countries all over the world, friend and foe alike.  Indeed, even yours portly winced at the drop in his various retirement accounts.

But the pain is worth it—and, we must remember, temporary.  What is often forgotten in the discussion about tariffs is that we have been the suckers, often dropping our trade barriers while other countries—even allies!—have kept their trade barriers in place.  The net result is that our manufacturing base has been stripped away since the end of the Second World War, and we have shifted into a consumer economy.

Read More »

SubscribeStar Saturday: Elective Libertarian Monarchy?

Pickup my newest release: The Galactic Menagerie!  Use promo code obesekangaroos to take an additional 20% off all purchases on Bandcamp!  Code expires at 11:59 PM UTC on Friday, 4 April 2025.

Today’s post is a SubscribeStar Saturday exclusive.  To read the full post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.  For a full rundown of everything your subscription gets, click here.

It has been absolutely remarkable to witness the yuge cultural-political shift since President Trump returned to office.  A flurry of executive action, coupled with robust efforts to gut USAID and even federal personnel, has subverted all expectations of what a president can do.  That a flurry of lawsuits have arisen in response to these actions does not seem to have dampened the energy of our very energetic executive.

The contrast with the last administration is glaring, not just for the sheer difference in activity—from zero to 100—but the quality of the executive actions taken.  President Biden—or, more likely, the invisible cadre of swamp dwellers who ran the government during the Jill Biden Regency—weaponized the federal government to persecute conservatives.  President Trump has weaponized the federal government to persecute… the federal government!

There is a common fantasy among doughy, slightly-above-average-IQ white guys of the libertarian king or dictator, someone who paradoxically wields the full power of the government to decrease its power.  The concept has some historical precedence, such as kings and emperors through history who have wielded power with a light touch, allowing their subjects to flourish.  Han China, England since at least the Stuarts, even the Mongols largely left people to pursue their own interests and passions and enterprises, so long as everyone paid their taxes and showed up for military service.

But the idea is a fantasy because it is unreal, impossible, in any real sense.  “Libertarian” means different things to different people; for most libertarians, it means smoking a lot of pot and being a weirdo in public.  The more generous definition would probably describe a system in which individuals pursue their own interests with limited or no government interference, in which the non-aggression principle is always applied.

Libertarianism is a pipe dream, though, because the non-aggression principle—the idea that my right to swing my fist ends where your nose begins—is not always applied.  Government exists in large part to protect us from a.) foreign invaders who don’t respect a nation’s sovereignty and b.) fellow citizens who don’t respect our bodies, homes, and property.  We have police because people sometimes act violently, and sometimes no amount of economic incentive can prevent a Friday night at the bar from turning into a scene from Roadhouse (1989).  If we were driven purely by economic incentives, no one ever get a DUI or an aggravated assault charge—or only those rich enough to pay the fines or to skirt jailtime could afford the luxury of reckless criminal behavior.

But for all of its deficiencies, the core of libertarian thought is the idea that the government that governs least, governs best.  That’s not always the case, but it’s a broadly good principle.  I get nervous every time I get a property tax bill for my house or my car, because I know that, even if I send in the check, if some bureaucrat makes a mistake, I could still lose everything—and the burden of proof would be on me to prove that I paid my taxes and that they made a mistake.  If that seems paranoid, think about the myriad stories of people losing their homes or farms or cars—or getting arrested!—because someone in some distant office made a clerical error.

Enter Donald Trump.  Trump is no libertarian—thank God!—but he possesses the very American impulse that most Americans want to be left alone to live their lives and to do their business relatively unmolested by the guarantors of their domestic tranquility:  the federal, State, and local governments.

With that in mind, his sweeping executive action so far—accomplished largely via executive orders—smacks flavorfully of an elected king wielding his power to restore more power to the people—and to reform the federal bureaucracy.

To read the rest of this post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.

MAGA Monday: Zelensky Gets Zapped

A quick note:  apologies to SubscribeStar readers; apparently, Saturday’s post, which was scheduled to pop at 6:30 AM EST that morning, never popped!  I posted it manually yesterday.  —TPP

Yours portly is once again playing catch-up, so I’m sharing the full meeting/press conference between President Trump and the little twerp from the Ukraine, President Zelensky:

To be clear, I don’t think Russia is good; their attempted conquest of the Ukraine has been incredibly disruptive to the lives of the Ukrainian people (to put it mildly) and to global order.  But that doesn’t make Ukraine and Zelensky saints, nor does it mean the United States should be getting involved in what is essentially a border conflict between similar peoples in a distant part of the globe.

Zelensky is perhaps the most entitled and disrespectful world leader I’ve ever seen.  He’s jetted around the globe cosplaying as some kind of freedom fighter.  He doesn’t even have the decency or respect to wear a coat and tie when begging us for money.  Even someone looking to get a bank loan to open up a mechanic’s shop changes out of coveralls and into a suit when asking the banker for money.

Read More »