Today’s post is a SubscribeStar Saturday exclusive. To read the full post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more. For a full rundown of everything your subscription gets, click here.
With the Iowa caucuses more or less in the books (did they ever actually get a final count?), the scuttle-butt around America’s Power Bottom, “Mayor Pete” Buttigieg, is heating up like a crowd of bejeweled dudes at a Miami nightclub. He’s cast as the “moderate” alternative to Bernie Sanders, the self-avowed “democratic socialist” who honeymooned in the Soviet Union and who continues to lure gullible Millennials with the promise that this time, it’ll work—honest!
But Buttigieg’s alleged “moderation” is a lie. On the issues, he’s far to the Left on many issues. Granted, that’s the overall trend in the Democratic Party, as everyone has had to embrace increasingly Leftist positions to remain electable in the activist-heavy primaries. Indeed, there’s no such thing as “conservative” Democrat anymore; such a creature is just a Republican who hasn’t taken the leap yet, for whatever reason.
Of course, this brings up a question: what exactly is political moderation? And a sub-question: does such a thing even exist?
To read the rest of this post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.

[…] (yours portly is in the “Acknowledgments,” tee hee). I express dismay at a “political moderate” colleague early in this essay, but the point of the essay was to explore how culture is […]
LikeLike
[…] Bernie, and competition between Klobuchar, Buttigieg, and Bloomberg for the so-called “moderate” […]
LikeLike
[…] suburban moms and “decorum” obsessed NeverTrumpers who think they’ll enjoy political moderation under a Democratic […]
LikeLike
[…] stomping set the stage for a socialist uprising in sixteen years? Or will the Democrats “moderate,” as they did in the […]
LikeLike