Note: the following post contains affiliate links. I receive a portion of any purchases made through these links, at no additional cost to you. —TPP
On Saturday I wrote at length about my idea for a physical, portable, monthly (now, after some feedback, likely quarterly) publication packed with fast-paced, pulp-style fiction for readers who are hungry to read short stories but don’t want to do so on a screen. I suspect there is a significant niche audience for this kind of publication, and it dovetails with my calls for conservatives to support like-minded authors. In an age of AI and online publishing, there is a segment of the population that craves authenticity and good storytelling.
Paradoxically, I turned to AI to begin brainstorming this idea. Regular readers will know that I am an AI-skeptic. I believe some aspects of AI are corrosive to creativity, such as doing actual writing (and, therefore, thinking) for humans; however, AI is hugely useful as a sounding board to conceptualize an idea. That is especially useful when an AI inspires real-world human creativity, and I think it can be powerful as an aid to human creativity, so long as we don’t make it a replacement for it.
That said, WordPress.com has their own AI-powered website builder, and I’ve been looking for an excuse to play around with it. I was initially torn about the ethics of creating a website using WordPress AI, but the way I look at it is that WordPress is offering a series of text-based prompts to create a website using tools that are readily available to WordPress.com users; it’s just offering up choices to users that they might not realize are native to WordPress.com.
In essence, the AI isn’t creating the website instead of the user, but is responding to the user’s prompts to design a website with the user. Ultimately, the final product is the result of substantial user input.
