Back in 2017, I was enthusiastic about the candidacy of Judge Roy Moore as he ran for US Senate in a special election in Alabama. Moore is a darling of social conservatives because of his willingness to challenge flawed higher court rulings on the establishment of religion. He famously refused to remove a monument of the Ten Commandments from the Alabama State Supreme Court in defiance of a federal court ruling, and was elected back to the bench after being removed for his defiance.
I relished the idea of this bumptious, no-nonsense Christian in the US Senate, and after he won the Republican nomination in a heated campaign against Establishment GOP favorite Luther Strange, I figured he would coast to an easy win.
Then, of course, the Left brought out the knives, and heretofore unspoken allegations of sexual misconduct from the murky past surfaced. Remember, Moore ran in multiple races, often as a controversial and high-profile figure, without any of these allegations ever surfacing. What made this race different?
In this piece from December 2017, I argue that Moore was railroaded, and that while some of the stories of his age-disparate relationships with teenage girls were likely true, they all seemed relatively benign given the times (the swingin’ 1970s). My basic takeaway was, and is, this: the worst of the allegations against Moore also was the most incongruous from others; Moore was super respectful to the other girls who mention dating him; and several of the girls were eager to date a successful, older attorney. Essentially, it’s highly unlikely he did anything illegal or wrong; he was just a dude who liked dating girls in their late teens. That’s a big unusual, but he wasn’t breaking any laws at the time.
With the modern Left, though, yesterday’s unorthodox peccadilloes become today’s wicked heresies (and vice-versa). That Moore is a fundamentalist, evangelical Christian made him an even more appealing target for character assassination. The noodle-wristed hand-wringers of Conservatism, Inc., were all too willing to fall over themselves proving to the Left that they, too, were good guys with their denunciations of Moore.
Here, then, is 2017’s “The Alabama Special Election, Principles, and Persecution“:
The campaign of Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore is reeling after allegations that, in the 1970s and 1980s, Moore dated several teenage girls. The Washington Post article that broke the news focuses on Leigh Corfman, who alleges that Moore approached her at the courthouse in Etowah County, Alabama, when she was only fourteen-years old. After obtaining her phone number, Corfman claims Moore met with her and forced her to touch him over the underwear.
- Four women–all above the legal age of consent–reported that Moore was respectful (one noted that after her mother forbid her from dating an older man, their relationship ended, apparently without any further fanfare).
- Leigh Corfman, who was fourteen at the time of the alleged groping, was the only woman accusing Moore of any explicitly illegal and illicit sexual activity.
- Tina Johnson emerged a few days into the controversy, alleging that Moore grabbed her butt in 1991. (Link)
- Judge Moore has been married to his wife, Kayla Moore, who is younger than him by fourteen years, for decades. She has defended her husband fiercely in the face of these accusations.
- Moore has run multiple local and statewide campaigns–many of them controversial–and no allegations have emerged during any of these (highly contentious) campaigns.
- Moore is a boogeyman for the political Left, and something of a Jacksonian folk hero for the Right. He famously refused to remove a monument of the Ten Commandments from the grounds of the Alabama Judicial Building after a federal court ruled it constituted an establishment of religion (Alan Keyes eloquently denounced that federal court order in a classic essay–and, for my students, perennial Government class assignment–entitled “On the Establishment of Religion: What the Constitution Really Says“), leading to his removal from the Alabama Supreme Court in 2003.
He was reelected to the Alabama Supreme Court ten years later, only to be removed again in 2016 for refusing to comply with the Supreme Court’s dubious decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that read into the Constitution a heretofore unwritten and unrecognized right for same-sex couples to marry.
- Moore was favored by the Bannonite-wing of the Republican Party (if such a thing exists) in the intense Republican primary run-off battle against Senator Luther Strange, who had been appointed to fill the vacant seat after Jeff Sessions was tapped to serve as Attorney General in the Trump administration. The Republican Establishment–notably Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, but also President Trump–supported Strange, while Moore was cast as the “Trumpian” candidate.
It’s no secret that the Washington Post endorsed Moore’s opponent, Democrat Doug Jones. Then the Post sought out women who claim to have had encounters with Moore. For a heavily left-leaning publication hoping to humiliate the sitting president and the Republican Party in a deep red state, the temptation to go after a popular but controversial populist figure would have to have been palpable.
The disdain of the Establishment Republicans for Moore (and, by extension, President Trump) could explain the fervor with which they have gone after Moore, calling for him to resign within mere hours of the Post‘s story breaking. It’s as though McConnell was just waiting for something like this to cross his desk, so he and other RINOs could rush out to denounce Moore and try to twenty-three-skidoo in their preferred candidate.
It seems that Republican leadership has succumbed to the same mania for virtue-signalling that dominates the Left. I can barely read National Review–formerly one of my favorite publications–because of its consistently noodle-wristed editorializing whenever any populist-oriented Republican speaks out of turn. Just read David French’s off-putting essay on “creepy Christianity” here. With friends like these, who needs enemies?
The worst of the accusations–the groping of the fourteen-year old and the incident in 1991–don’t seem to fit the pattern of the stories the other women told the Post. I’m fully willing to concede that, based on what we’re learning now, a young Roy Moore dated some girls in their late teens. He married a woman fourteen years his junior. Clearly, he had a taste for younger women, but he hasn’t committed adultery, as one of his most vocal critics, Senator John McCain, did, and his relationships, by all accounts, were above-board. He’s remained faithful–as far as we know–to his wife.
“For a heavily left-leaning publication hoping to humiliate the sitting president and the Republican Party in a deep red state, the temptation to go after a popular but controversial populist figure would have to have been palpable.”
It may seem unorthodox now–and I am certainly not advocating that thirty-two-year old men start dating sixteen-year olds!–but such age-disparate relationships were more common and socially acceptable forty years ago. For a fuller examination of this point, I refer you to Frank J. Tipler’s piece at American Thinker; read it here.
Regardless, the Left has no logical grounds for objection. How can a philosophical and political movement that endorses every sexual arrangement imaginable stand against legal, age-disparate, consenting relationships and maintain even a modicum of internal consistency? Again, this is no endorsement of such relationships, but if you’re the party of transgender, bisexual, polyamorous, gay, lesbian, queer, inter-species rights, how can you draw the line here? You’ve already run miles past it.
Ultimately, squeamish National Review-and-Establishment types are claiming the moral high ground, arguing that a US Senate seat isn’t worth sacrificing principles. At this point, though, their haste to condemn Moore smacks of moral cowardice and political opportunism. Are they not going to at least entertain the idea that the man is innocent, or was just a bit unorthodox in his dating habits forty years ago? Rather than try to scuttle a still-popular candidate before he barely has a chance to defend himself, could not McConnell and other Senate Republicans attempt to reach out to the Moore campaign? Even if he’s not your style of Republican, you could learn to work with him, rather than prome to expel him from the Senate if he wins!
This video from Stefan Molyneux (below; WARNING–NSFW) gets down to brass tacks: preserving the Republican’s razor-thin majority in the Senate is worth showing some political backbone, rather than allowing a partial-birth abortion-supporting Democrat to snag the seat.
This election suggests that Establishment Republicans, for all their talk of decorum and principles, are sometimes little better or different than their Democratic opponents. They don’t want a scrappy culture warrior And despite some dire poll numbers, the accusations may not stick: according to RCP polling, Moore was up 3 points over Jones (as of 14 November), though he has fallen to a far more dicey 0.8% lead (as of 16 November, the date this post was written). That’s within the margin of error, though certainly not the double-digit lead Republicans want in Alabama. More on those poll numbers, and my analysis of them, to come.
If we learn that Moore did indeed assault Leigh Cofrman, than I’ll retract my defense of him immediately. But for now, we have no consistent pattern of bad behavior, and what appears to be some very powerful opponents arrayed against a man who has suffered professionally for his beliefs. From where I’m sitting, Judge Moore’s treatment looks more like persecution than justice.
The Portly Politico 
.jpg){kind=link}