TBT: VP Vance: A Worthy Successor

It’s hard to believe that a year ago, we were gearing up for a presidential election.  Now Trump is back in office—woooooot!—and he has a worthy successor in the wings.

It’s going to be tough sledding in the years ahead, but it’s reassuring to know that we have a legitimate successor ready to roll in 2028.  Vance’s incredible speech to the various heads of Europe’s governments earlier this year was a call to government accountability—and for Europe to wake up.  It was not an attack on Europe, per se, but a powerful plea for its leaders to do something to improve the lives of their people.

I’m excited to see more from Vance in the years to come.

With that, here is 17 July 2024’s “VP Vance: A Worthy Successor“:

Read More »

TBT^65,536: End the Income Tax

I hate the income tax.  It’s an intrusive and demoralizing experience filing them every year.  Why does the federal government get to know about every transaction I’ve made over the course of a fiscal year?

It’s also expensive.  I work exceptionally hard so that I can attempt to enjoy a decent quality of life.  That’s only gotten harder with inflation.  As I prepared my income taxes this year, I found that, even though I earned less from lessons during FY2024 than FY2023, I somehow owed more money—by a factor of three.

When I first wrote this post, I argued for a national sales tax as the lesser of two evils.  Now, I’m tariffs all the way, baby.  They act, in a sense, as a national sales tax, but they have the social benefit of bringing jobs and industries back to the United States.  I’d rather pay an extra fifty bucks for my American-made washing machine and give a fellow citizen a good job than have to shell out my meager savings and reveal all of my financial underwear to the IRS every April.

At least with Trump in office, there is a faint hope—very faint, but a hope nonetheless—that the income tax might be reaching the end of its abusive, wicked life.  What a terrible system!

With that, here is 11 April 2024’s “TBT^256: End the Income Tax“:

Read More »

Tariffs: Worth It

There’s been a great deal of bellyaching this week about the tariffs that President Trump has slapped on countries all over the world, friend and foe alike.  Indeed, even yours portly winced at the drop in his various retirement accounts.

But the pain is worth it—and, we must remember, temporary.  What is often forgotten in the discussion about tariffs is that we have been the suckers, often dropping our trade barriers while other countries—even allies!—have kept their trade barriers in place.  The net result is that our manufacturing base has been stripped away since the end of the Second World War, and we have shifted into a consumer economy.

Read More »

SubscribeStar Saturday: Elective Libertarian Monarchy?

Pickup my newest release: The Galactic Menagerie!  Use promo code obesekangaroos to take an additional 20% off all purchases on Bandcamp!  Code expires at 11:59 PM UTC on Friday, 4 April 2025.

Today’s post is a SubscribeStar Saturday exclusive.  To read the full post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.  For a full rundown of everything your subscription gets, click here.

It has been absolutely remarkable to witness the yuge cultural-political shift since President Trump returned to office.  A flurry of executive action, coupled with robust efforts to gut USAID and even federal personnel, has subverted all expectations of what a president can do.  That a flurry of lawsuits have arisen in response to these actions does not seem to have dampened the energy of our very energetic executive.

The contrast with the last administration is glaring, not just for the sheer difference in activity—from zero to 100—but the quality of the executive actions taken.  President Biden—or, more likely, the invisible cadre of swamp dwellers who ran the government during the Jill Biden Regency—weaponized the federal government to persecute conservatives.  President Trump has weaponized the federal government to persecute… the federal government!

There is a common fantasy among doughy, slightly-above-average-IQ white guys of the libertarian king or dictator, someone who paradoxically wields the full power of the government to decrease its power.  The concept has some historical precedence, such as kings and emperors through history who have wielded power with a light touch, allowing their subjects to flourish.  Han China, England since at least the Stuarts, even the Mongols largely left people to pursue their own interests and passions and enterprises, so long as everyone paid their taxes and showed up for military service.

But the idea is a fantasy because it is unreal, impossible, in any real sense.  “Libertarian” means different things to different people; for most libertarians, it means smoking a lot of pot and being a weirdo in public.  The more generous definition would probably describe a system in which individuals pursue their own interests with limited or no government interference, in which the non-aggression principle is always applied.

Libertarianism is a pipe dream, though, because the non-aggression principle—the idea that my right to swing my fist ends where your nose begins—is not always applied.  Government exists in large part to protect us from a.) foreign invaders who don’t respect a nation’s sovereignty and b.) fellow citizens who don’t respect our bodies, homes, and property.  We have police because people sometimes act violently, and sometimes no amount of economic incentive can prevent a Friday night at the bar from turning into a scene from Roadhouse (1989).  If we were driven purely by economic incentives, no one ever get a DUI or an aggravated assault charge—or only those rich enough to pay the fines or to skirt jailtime could afford the luxury of reckless criminal behavior.

But for all of its deficiencies, the core of libertarian thought is the idea that the government that governs least, governs best.  That’s not always the case, but it’s a broadly good principle.  I get nervous every time I get a property tax bill for my house or my car, because I know that, even if I send in the check, if some bureaucrat makes a mistake, I could still lose everything—and the burden of proof would be on me to prove that I paid my taxes and that they made a mistake.  If that seems paranoid, think about the myriad stories of people losing their homes or farms or cars—or getting arrested!—because someone in some distant office made a clerical error.

Enter Donald Trump.  Trump is no libertarian—thank God!—but he possesses the very American impulse that most Americans want to be left alone to live their lives and to do their business relatively unmolested by the guarantors of their domestic tranquility:  the federal, State, and local governments.

With that in mind, his sweeping executive action so far—accomplished largely via executive orders—smacks flavorfully of an elected king wielding his power to restore more power to the people—and to reform the federal bureaucracy.

To read the rest of this post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.

SubscribeStar Saturday: Tariffs Work

Today’s post is a SubscribeStar Saturday exclusive.  To read the full post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.  For a full rundown of everything your subscription gets, click here.

Amid a flurry of big news this week—which seems to be the norm now that Trump is back in office—one of the major stories was the president of Colombia backing down once Trump slapped some tariffs on his country for refusing to accept deportation flights from the United States.  That the Colombian government didn’t even want their own people back tells you everything you need to know about the quality of these immigrants.

But I digress.  Trump is wielding tariffs like a serious foreign policy weapon, which works exceptionally well when you’re the most powerful and productive economy on the Earth.  Yes, the United States has struggled economically in recent years, but we’re still on top.  Tariffs will only help with that goal, by bringing back manufacturing; ending America’s reliance on the financialization of everything as the driver of our economic growth; and forcing recalcitrant nations to play ball.

It is remarkable that we are returning, after the long fever trade of unbridled free trade—even at our own expense—to the age of William McKinley, a president that is often forgotten, but who has enjoyed renewed cache in recent years.  President Trump explicitly mentioned McKinley in his Inaugural Address, and the former president’s legacy is experiencing a renaissance of sorts.

Today (Saturday, 1 February 2025), Canada, Mexico, and China will face new tariffs on their goods.  Each of these nations have exploited America’s good will by flooding our nation with illegal fentanyl and immigrants.  It is about dang time.

To read the rest of this post, subscribe to my SubscribeStar page for $1 a month or more.

TBT: Stone Cold Sunday

With the dawn of the Second Trumpian Golden Age, I’ve been reflecting a bit about the First.  Trump’s first administration, in retrospect, was less-focused and more carnival-esque than what his second appears to be.  Trump is a wiser man, and knows who he can—and cannot—trust.

But part of the fun of the first Trump presidency was the cavalcade of grifters, courtiers, and hangers-on who hitched their wagon to Trump’s star.

One of those was Roger Stone, who actually was an important figure while also embodying the kind of naughty, playful, mirthful, bawdy side of the Trump phenomenon.  I wrote a review of his book Stone’s Rules: How to Win at Politics, Business, and Style back in 2019, and it seemed like an appropriate time to revisit it.

Note that the link above is an Amazon Affiliate link; if you purchase anything through that link, I receive a portion of the proceeds, at no additional cost to you.  I’m required to point that out.

With that, here is 10 February 2019’s “Stone Cold Sunday“:

Read More »

River of Tear

Trump is in office, and what a glorious start it has been.  It seems like finally—finally!—something is going to be done about illegal immigration.

Pictures and videos circulated yesterday of a chubby Mexican woman shedding crocodile tears upon realizing that the “punch-for-a-free-green-card” app the Biden administration had been running was no longer functioning, and all hearings for entry into the country via the app had been stopped.  It was glorious:

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I’m not normally one to gloat about human pain and suffering—I do understand why people are desperate to get to our awesome country and away from their pitiful hellholes.  But we can’t and shouldn’t take everyone in, and it seems like the majority of Americans have finally come around to that perspective.

Read More »

Make Greenland American

We’re just five days away from President/President-Elect Trump’s inauguration, and I’m as giddy as a schoolboy at the candy shop.  There is much to be excited about in a second Trump administration, but lately I’ve been whooping like a silver-backed gorilla (at the candy shop, presumably) over the prospect of purchasing Greenland from Denmark—and taking back the Panama Canal.

The coverage of President-Elect Trump’s desire to take Greenland features a mix of bemusement and alarm, which is pretty on-brand for Trump’s pronouncements.  There is a lot of chest-thumping from the European Union and the Danes, who both vow that the United States will never have Greenland.  President Trump, for his part, seems to be having fun trolling the stuffed shirts in Europe and the hostile American press, especially with his talk of annexing Canada (which is trolling; I think Trump is just having fun at Justin Trudeau’s expense).

What I like about all this annexation talk is that it hearkens back to the presidency of James K. Polk.  It was under Polk that the United States expanded to (mostly) its present borders, at least in the contiguous, lower forty-eight States.  Polk similarly struck an aggressively expansionist tone, proclaiming “Fifty-Four Forty or Fight” in reference to the upper border of the Oregon Territory.

Read More »

Kick Out the Cat Ladies

Regular readers will know I have a strong, even pathological, anti-femite streak.  It’s perhaps ironic, as many of my readers are women, and I actually find most women quite charming and pleasant company.  That said, I can’t ignore how terrible things tend to go when women are in charge of anything more substantial than the local church bake sale or the PTA.

With the notable exceptions—and I have to mention them because women in particular don’t seem to understand the concept of “generalization“—women are not really suited for politics, governance, management, etc.  What they do really well, however, is act as the social glue that binds a community together.  Again, if you want your church bake sale to be a success or your PTA to hound delusional administrators, women are your best option.

If you want to direct grand strategy and pursue a sane domestic policy, leave it to the men.  Women in politics seem to boil down to “kill babies, give me free stuff!”  It was Republican women in South Carolina, for example, who blocked a total abortion ban in my State; all three of them were booted from the South Carolina Senate in their primary elections, leaving our State Senate blessedly free of female meddling.

Lately there’s been some hubbub over J.D. Vance’s past comments about women, particularly his claim that our country is being run by “childless cat ladies” and the “childless Left.”  National Review, the bastion of fake conservative handwringers, fumed simpishly over Vance’s comments, while not exactly addressing the substance of what he said.  After all, Vance said the unpopular part out loud—the cat ladies “are miserable in their own lives and the choices they’ve made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too.”

Read More »

Biden Out

By the time you’re reading this post, it will be old news, but President Biden announced he would not seek re-election in 2024.  At the time of writing, the likely nominee is Vice President Kamala Harris.

While I was hoping for the chaos (and, quite frankly, the sheer political science interest) of a brokered convention, it seems even the Democrats realize that would probably not work well for them.

It’s an interesting situation:  Kamala Harris has the opportunity to become President in spite of the fact that she was jaw-droppingly unpopular in the 2020 Democratic primaries.  At the same, she’s assuming the mantle barely over 100 days out from the election.  She’s going up against a yugely popular Trump campaign, coming on the heels of a triumphant Republican National Convention and President Trump’s survival of an assassination attempt.

That perhaps explains why no other likely Democrat has announced his or her candidacy.  While there are notable Democratic figures who have not endorse Harris at the time of writing, there does not appear to be any eagerness to challenge her, either.  Doing so would be a Pyrrhic victory:  seizing the Democratic nomination from Harris only to go down in flames against Trump.  Indeed, it would be seizing a Pyrrhic victory from a Pyrrhic victor, as Harris does not seem likely to win the election.

Read More »