I can now proudly attest that the esteemed Audre Myers, perhaps the one figure at the epicenter of my personal blogosphere, has contributed her first piece to The Portly Politico. What a treat! Even the way that Audre contacted me about her contribution is quintessential Audre: she framed it as giving me a day off from the blog. Very sweet!
I’m happy to give a day—or weeks!—over to Audre’s writing. Her own blog, Words on the Word, is a lovely daily devotional; I recommend it highly.
Audre also shares my love of the spooky, the weird, the unexplained. One of the first ways I became acquainted with Audre’s interests were her posts about Bigfoot over at Nebraska Energy Observer. Here was someone writing with depth and seriousness—not conspiratorial goofiness—about Sasquatch!
That love of spooky weirdness is perfect for Audre’s contribution this week: her broad review of the series Stranger Things, one of my personal favorite series as well. The fourth season has just hit Netflix, so Audre offers up her take on the series as a whole—without giving away any of the fun plot points!
So, for the four of you out there that still haven’t seen Stranger Things, here’s Audre’s excellent review of and recommendation for the series:
I am on the ++ side of 50 and I grew up on horror movies, monster movies, Twilight Zone; the first book I read – that I chose for myself from my elementary school library – was an Edgar Allan Poe compilation. I’ve been a fan of ‘things that go bump in the night‘ for a very long time. A lot of that genre can be, ummm, less than spectacular, as The Portly Politico’s Monday reviews can attest (love Port’s and 39 Pontiac Dream’s reviews of really bad horror movies!). But sometimes … sometimes, you can stumble upon a nugget of gold.
Season four of Stranger Things has finally dropped to Netflix and I am over-joyed. Created and produced by Matt and Ross Duffer, they have accomplished quite an amazingly satisfying series – regardless of the age of the viewer. Like The Walking Dead, Stranger Things has a fan base with a huge demographic – from pre-teens to folks ‘of a certain age’, like me. Here is the link to their Wikipedia page if you’d like to know more about them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duffer_brothers
Something is going on in Hawkins, a little town in Indiana. Something not right; something strange, as a matter of fact. A group of misfit pre-teens become aware of the strangeness and there starts the story that will not only grab you but impel you to watch all of the seasons of the show. A great many people have a certain discomfort with child actors but I have to attest that, in this case, the casting couldn’t have been any better. These kids are awkward – pre-teen, after all – but that very awkwardness lends depth and a certain subtlety to the characters and makes them very real. This will be the one and only time you read me say anything good about Wynona Ryder’s acting ability; she is so bad an actress that that deficiency makes her absolutely perfect for the part of the mother of one of the pre-teen boys that is the catalyst in story. I know. I know. But believe me, she’s so bad she’s good in this one particular role. David Harbour (now a secret crush for yours truly) plays the Sheriff in Hawkins and he walks a very fine line between stereotype and epitome; common man with foibles and emotional baggage. One of all the children, Millie Bobbie Brown, stands head and shoulders above the rest of the kids and she is a gold mine for this series. Where they found her, I have no idea but keep an eye on her career; she’ll accomplish a great body of work if her acting abilities mature along with her age. She makes Stranger Things.
Now comes the hard part. How do I share with you why you should watch the series (without ‘spoiler alerts’?). I commend the Duffer Brothers – they have created a ‘something’ we’ve never seen before. There is no zombie lore or vampire lore to apply to the something. It’s original and it’s horrifying. No ghost history which can be applied here. It’s new – a new horror. Those of us familiar with 1950s horror movies that pointed to the government as the bad guys were prepared to laugh this off and drop IQ points from the series but those Duffer boys tweaked that old chestnut.
There is a good deal of humor in the series, a lot of laughing at ourselves as we relive our adolescence through the kids who live in Hawkins. There’s a lot of ‘I remember when …’ moments. The horror stuff they do really well, considering this is not some blockbuster Hollywood movie; small can be – and is – effective. Atmosphere – they are able to create a creeping unease as the story unfolds and sometimes we feel the mother’s desperation in a very intimate way.
I’ll bet that if you give season one a try, you’ll be up for and wanting the rest of the seasons. Have I ever steered you wrong? Why not take a shot and see just how Stranger Things can be.
Bless your heart! Your intro was better than my article!!! Thank you, Port.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Most excellent piece of writing although nothing could compel me to watch a horror film.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I knew that. But I love you anyway, lol!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent review, Audre, but I’m sorry – I was gripped until you said Winona ‘Tourettes’ Ryder was in it.
She taints everything she’s in and removes a star from the rating just by being in it. If she gets killed in it – and bloody – I’ll probably give it a watch but if she drags her stupid, skinny posterior through 4 seasons, then sorry, I just can’t.
LikeLiked by 3 people
She really is not that prominent, as I recall. She is the mother of a missing boy in the first season, so she has some screen time, of course, but the focus is on the kids and their adventures.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Perfect, Port!
LikeLiked by 1 person
If she prominently suffers and then prominently dies a horrific death, I may give it a go. If not, sorry, it ain’t happening! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sigh … I guess I understand but I thinking you’re missing out on something here.
LikeLiked by 3 people
We can’t watch TV anyway, on account of having no TV license nor a desire to start funding the BBC again. We tend to wait until something is on DVD, check it out and then buy. One of the only series that intrigues me at the moment is Squid Game. That’s something we might pick up.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d gladly take our inane advertisements over having to buy a license from the government to watch television any day. Fortunately, _Stranger Things_ is on Netflix. _Squid Game_ is VERY good; highly recommended.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yeah, he’s missing out. Give Winona another chance!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Winona is the cat with 80 lives.
I’ll give her another chance when you and Audre give Joe Biden another chance. Deal?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, I believe we’ve reached an impasse.
LikeLiked by 3 people
You made me laugh. You’re exactly correct – her ‘Ryder-ness’ actually increases the sense of dread and desperation in the story.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Talking of Joe Biden, Tina and I have been rewatching Supernatural. Audre will remember this. The head leviathan refers to the replaceable as ‘Joe Biden types – no spark, nothing in you.’ Perfectly apt!
I tried to put up the link but it didn’t take. If you go onto Youtube and type supernatural leviathan joe biden, you’ll get the 37 second clip. Priceless.
LikeLiked by 2 people
OMG!!! I’m rewatching the series right now, too!!! Too funny! I started from the pilot so haven’t gotten to the leviathans yet. Right now, I’m looking forward to ‘meeting’ Charlie (I tho’t she was great; I really enjoyed her) and the skinny bug-eyed guy that you can’t help liking – as the Winchester Boys discovered.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I was planning at some point to review Supernatural but from 1-5. There are some good episodes and moments from 6 onwards but in my opinion, they didn’t need to be made.
At the end of 5, Sam jumps into the pit, Dean moves in with Lisa and Ben and then you see Sam watching him so you know he’s out of the pit and Dean is happy. That’s where it should have ended for me but like many American series, it goes on much longer than it has to. We bought the last series last year and still haven’t watched it; the first few episodes were terrible and Tina struggles with the blasphemy – ie, God’s sister and the Winchesters fighting against God. I like the episodes with The Darkness but I agree with Tina; the blasphemy is off the charts.
LikeLiked by 3 people
You’ll not be surprised by this but my other favorite character is Crawley – King of Hell, lol.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wow, that does sound pretty blasphemous. I’ve heard a great deal about _Supernatural_, but have never watched it myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
HA! What a sick burn.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Supernatural is great and there are some good episodes and storylines from season 6 onwards but there’s also a lot of dross. For me, it ended perfectly at season 5 and should have stopped there. Problem with American series though is if people are still watching, on and on they go. It was like that with Friends. Should have ended after season 2. Ross finally got with Rachel and it should have ended on a happy note. What happened is they dragged it on for 8 more tired series, to the point where the characters became whiny and annoying.
I’m still looking forward to purchasing the last series of The Walking Dead but man, finish it after Negan! That series could have ended 2 years ago but they carried on. I’ll never understand it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Precisely. Gotta keep churning those ad dollars. Perhaps that is the sole benefit of the model y’all have in Britain, where you pay the government for a television license—the shows aren’t driven solely by a quest for ad revenue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The evil characters are always the best. Crawley, played by England’s own Mark Shepherd (he also played the villain in the first series episode of X-Files, Fire), is superb as is the guy who played Richard Roman, Mark Pellegrino as Lucifer and Freddy Laine as the yellow eyed demon. The bad guys are always more interesting.
We’re going to do this rewatch properly this time and watch all of it, including the last series. It might be painful but we’ll get there.
I’m looking forward to Tyler’s number 6 choice for bad films next week. When we finally get onto top 10 best, will you be aiding us, Audre?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, 39! I don’t have near the talent and insight you and Port do! I guess I could do one as comic relief!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I disagree. I remember reading your pieces before you took a regular post at Neo and one thing I can say is that if I liked your writing before, I love it now. Your writing has come on in leaps and bounds and I love the disparity – you write on a whole range of things and all of them are weaved in your particular style which makes your pieces interesting, deep and, where the cases may arise, funny. I’m sure Port would agree with me in saying how much fun it’d be to write top 10 bests with yours as well. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Golly! You sure know how to humble a person. And you’re hurting my arm! (wink)
Ok; I don’t know if I can come up with 10 but there are horror movies I really liked – I guess I could muster up a couple of articles. But be warned! They will not be as good as yours and Port’s. Just accept that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m sure they’ll be great. No need to do ten—it’s daunting! I’ll take whatever you wish to submit.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, I agree completely. You approach writing like the weaver approaches the loom. The weaving analogy is apt—you wonderfully stitch together connections between seemingly disparate topics, which I love.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You should definitely do one, Audre. I’d be curious to see what you consider to be the worst movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I found #6 last night. I’m glad I had Memorial Day off, because I needed some time. It’s getting hard to find bad movies!
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s never hard to find bad movies. It is hard, though, to remember them! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! And that is precisely the problem, old chap.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll never accept that. There’s no better, just different. Plus, I doubt for a second that you and Tyler will swear in yours; you’re both too smart and polite for it. If I really despise something, I have to say what I feel and if that includes some rather ignorant blue language, then so be it! 🙂
Tina’s just got the bunting out for the jubilee celebrations. We’ve bought enough booze to drop Richard Harris and we’re ready for the party atmosphere. God save the Queen! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
God save the Queen indeed! Will she be out and about or will Prince Charles take over for her?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think she’ll be out and about in some capacity. It’s been a few difficult years for her so it’ll warm her heart to see so many people celebrating her reign. The republicans (anti-monarchy lot) won’t but who cares what they think? Tina and I are staunch monarchists and we’ll raise a glass or few of bubbly to her perfect 70 years as head of state. We’ll never see the like again.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I absolutely agree! She is a most remarkable woman!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Amen to that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here, here! Hopefully the celebration will lift her spirits. Seventy years! Absolutely astounding.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m sure they’ll wheel her out for the jubilee.
LikeLike
God Save the Queen! Y’all enjoy the bunting ‘n’ booze.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A quick off topic, Tyler, but if you get a few hours or so with your piano in the next month or so, can you give Exogenesis: Symphony Part 2 (Muse) a go? It’d be interesting to see you master that. Just listening to it at the moment as I’m pottering about. It’s a gorgeous bit of piano playing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Muse might be a bit above my experience level, but I’ll give it a go!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good stuff. Exogenesis Pt 3 has a lovely piano intro too. Matt Bellamy is one of the most talented all round musicians there has ever been and he also has a great voice. Git! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll give it a listen! I haven’t listened to a Muse tune in years. Time to change that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stranger Things 1 & 2 were enjoyable, Season 3 was a disaster: two episodes of plot stretched over nine and the humiliation of all the male characters.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m sure The Drinker did something recently on that. Said the early stuff was good but like all good things, the Woke got their claws into it and it started to slide. I think it was The Drinker, anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lot of franchises follow the pattern.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s the curse of success—a show gets huge ratings, and the production companies want to milk the cash cow until its udders are squeezed dry and the brilliance of the original concept and plot is completely withered away.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ll look it up. You’ve turned me on to The Drinker, and some other bloggers I know like him as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I watched seasons one and two and can attest to their excellence. I’d heard season three was dross, but I still think I need to watch it. I may restart the entire series.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Season 3 recap: Hopper dies of estrogen poisoning. Will is gay because he wants to do guy stuff with guys instead of moping over chicks. Lucas says “if you want a white chick to like you, you have to totally kiss her ass!”, white chick treats him like crap. Steve learns to love the friend zone. Something something about the same monster from season 2, only smaller.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Geeze. That sounds terrible.
LikeLike
Some of my friends said it got better as it went along. There was an attempt at Cold War nostalgia that some people liked but I never got into it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Everyone’s nostalgic for mutually-assured destruction. Good times!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I sent an article to TCW on the jubilee. I’m hoping it might go up tomorrow but it’d be presumptuous of me to think they’ll use it at all. There are far better writers (in that capacity) on the site than me.
LikeLiked by 3 people
If they don’t, send it along, I certainly would, and I suspect Tyler would as well. Hard to do it justice from over here, and not many things are the same as when I was born. But she is. If you or Nicholas don’t I suppose I’ll have to try and probably botch it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’ve never known you to a botch an article, certainly not in the time I’ve known you. Your writing is first rate.
As for the piece, I think Kathy might put it up. The only issue she had in it was one of libel, which I knew when I wrote it! Still, it gave me and Tina something to giggle about! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ha! What did you write that was potentially libelous?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent, I’ll look for it! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Neo beat me to it! But his blog is the more overtly Anglophilic of our two. Ponty’s piece on the Jubilee would be better suited to NEO.
LikeLiked by 3 people
And pretty Royalist as well. Although that’ll likely change when Chuckie takes the throne.
It’d be fine on either, but I do write more on the Land of UK, my readership is split most days between the countries.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know it’s a corny and trite to write it, but I wonder if old Chuckles will ever take the throne, at this point. I can’t imagine his reign will be all that auspicious or lengthy, although he’s surely inherited his mother’s longevity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I expect he will. Andin truth attractive as he is, William has some of the same weaknesses. I’d actually prefer Princess Margaret, but nobody asked me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Alys believes the best ‘next in line’ is Princess Ann – she’s tough cookie, Ann.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That would also be excellent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What have really been excellent are all of the comments on the blog today. My cup runneth over.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t know the royal family that well, but William does seem like a good bloke, with a dutiful and classy babe for a wife.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A bit woke though, climate change and apologizing for English history and such nonsense. Far better than his old man though.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The consensus seems to be that anyone is better than Charles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That even seems to be the consensus in the UK. Sad.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fingers crossed, buddy. Keep us posted!
LikeLiked by 3 people
‘A lot of franchises follow the pattern.’
Yes they do and they’ll go out of business if they continue.
My next entry (on mine and Tyler’s top 10 worst films of all time list) is a recent Disney film and crikey, it was a stinker. They had the opportunity to put out a good old fashioned adventure movie and what came out in the end was utter drivel. Keep an eye out because I have a feeling you’ll know what film I’m talking about.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Oh, man, Disney—talk about “go woke, go broke.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘Ha! What did you write that was potentially libelous?’
I referred to Prince Harry as Harry Hewitt! I knew it was libellous when I wrote it but as it was an opinion piece (and a little cheeky), I thought Kathy might keep it in. No dice though. I guess she has to protect the interests of the site, especially since they’re being censored nowadays.
LikeLiked by 2 people
HA! Very nice. You could probably get away with that in the United States.
LikeLike
And Alys would be right. Princess Anne would be perfect. Unfortunately she’s not in the line of succession.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I knew that; I wrote it incorrectly. Sorry.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No need to apologize, Audre. After, the line of succession was made to be broken. ; D
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps through some insane succession crisis you’d end up with a _King Ralph_ (1991) situation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Ralph
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice. I have just finished watching 4th season. I have written similarities between stranger things and stephen king books. Do read and share your comments. https://gobookmart.com/connection-of-stranger-things-to-stephen-kings-books/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing! Looking forward to reading this post, Gobookmart.com!
LikeLike